Table 6. Individual hole-entering responses per minute during the extinction condition.
Group | Bee 1 | Bee 2 | Bee 3 | Bee 4 | Bee 5 | Bee 6 | Bee 7 | Bee 8 | Bee 9 | Bee 10 | |
0-0-X | 6.37 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 4.9 | 15.3 | 2.5 | 8.8 | 9.9 | 4.0 | 10.4 | 3.7 |
0-15-X | 9.125 | * | 5.8 | 19.4 | * | 5.2 | 12.4 | 5.2 | 6.3 | 6.8 | 11.9 |
0-30-X | 10.12 | 9.4 | 2.9 | * | * | * | * | 11.2 | 8.9 | 18.2 | * |
0-60-X | N/A | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * |
0-120-X | N/A | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * |
Extinction response rates were higher for subjects exposed to a FI schedule compared to control CRF schedule subjects (observed PCC value: 0.67, observed c-value: <0.01; complete PCC value: 0.34, c-value: <0.01). However, extinction response rates for subjects exposed to the FI 15-sec schedule were not smaller than response rates for subjects exposed to the FI 30-sec schedule (PCC value: 0.55; c-value: 0.32).
*Subject stopped returning before the extinction condition.