Table 2.
Estimatea (95% CI) | P-value | |
---|---|---|
Female | 1.31 (1.05, 1.63) | 0.019 |
Age | 0.018 | |
20 years | 0.70 (0.55, 0.90) | |
30 years (ref) | 1 | |
40 years | 1.03 (0.92, 1.15) | |
50 years | 0.90 (0.66, 1.21) | |
Education (per 2 years) | 1.13 (1.00, 1.28) | 0.058 |
Travel time to clinic (per 30 minutes) | 1.01 (0.94, 1.08) | 0.79 |
Transportation | 0.66 | |
Walk (ref) | 1 | |
Bike | 1.14 (0.84, 1.54) | |
Car/motorcycle | 1.09 (0.81, 1.45) | |
Traditional healer (TH) use | <0.001 | |
Did not consult TH (ref) | 1 | |
Consulted 1 TH | 1.47 (1.12, 1.93) | |
Consulted 2 TH | 2.45 (1.73, 3.47) | |
Consulted 3 TH | 2.12 (1.42, 3.16) | |
Consulted 4 TH | 2.90 (1.78, 4.73) | |
Consulted 5 or more TH | 5.69 (4.16, 7.78) | |
Consulted religious leaderb | 1.13 (0.83, 1.54) | 0.45 |
Community | <0.001 | |
Namacurra (ref) | 1 | |
Inhassunge | 0.52 (0.40, 0.66) |
Because duration from symptom to testing is log-transformed, the model effect is the ratio of the geometric mean for the comparison and reference groups. Thus, we are able to summarize delay time in terms of percent change.
There is little evidence of a hypothesized interaction between use of traditional and/or religious healers (p=0.78); the interaction term was not included in this final model.