Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 25;48(2):120–126. doi: 10.2478/raon-2014-0012

TABLE 2.

Comparison of the performances of PET and arterial- and venous-phase CT

N = 14 #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7a #7b #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13
PET + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
CT, art. phase - c c c c + c c + - c c + -
CT, ven. phase - - - - - + - - + - - - + -
SUVmax 23.4 43.6 5.9 43.7 31.5 6.2 9.0 5.5 64.6 9.5 10.3 11.3 58.0 14.1
Localisation ile duo ile duo duo duo jej jej duo duo jej duo ile duo
Proceeding after PET/CT OP OP FU 36m FU 37m OP OP OP OP OP OP FU 14m OP OP FU 52m

+ = suspicious lesion; - = nonsuspicious lesion; c = suspicious CT lesion in combination with PET (hyperperfusion) for true positive NET lesions (n = 14/13 patients) according to the reference standard; duo = duodenum; FU = follow-up; ile = ileum; jej = jejunum; m = months; OP = operation