Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 18;11(6):6335–6353. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110606335

Table 3.

Comparison of mean score (MS) and 95% of confidence interval of means (CI) of four factors of hospital resilience, using the hospital sample in Shandong, China, 2012.

Variables No. Component Factors
Emergency Response (F1) Management Mechanisms (F2) Safety (F3) Resources (F4) Overall Score (F)
MS MS MS MS MS
CI CI CI CI CI
Level Tertiary A 27 29.26 12.89 8.07 2.26 52.48
24.33, 34,19 * 11.85, 13.93 * 7.44, 8.70 * 1.98, 2.54 * 46.69, 58.27 *
Tertiary B 14 24.29 7.86 6.93 1.29 40.36
15.95, 32.62 * 6.58, 9.14 * 6.31, 7.55 * 0.63, 1.94 * 30.45, 50.27 *
Type General 27 31.60 11.30 7.63 2.00 52.52
26.23, 36.96 * 9.83, 12.76 7.09, 8.17 1.59, 2.41 * 45.63, 59.40 *
Specialized 14 19.79 10.93 7.79 1.79 40.29
14.96, 24.61 * 9.20, 12.66 6.72, 8.85 1.27, 2.30 * 34.08, 46.49 *
Disaster Mission Assigned 13 37.31 13.92 8.23 2.38 61.85
31.27, 43.34 * 12.26, 15.59 * 7.48, 8.98 2.08, 2.69 * 54.99, 68.70 *
No mission 28 23.04 9.89 7.43 1.71 42.07
18.34, 27.74 * 8.74, 11.05 * 6.81, 8.05 1.29, 2.13 * 36.42, 47.73 *
No. Category Total 41 27.56 11.17 7.68 1.93 48.34

Notes: Emergency medical response capability, (highest score = 51); Emergency management mechanisms, (highest score = 17); hospital safety and vulnerability, (highest score = 9); disaster resources (highest score = 4); MS: Mean score CI: 95% confidence interval of means. * p < 0.05; Tested by non-parameter test (Mann-Whitney Test).