Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 14.
Published in final edited form as: J Mater Chem B. 2014 Feb 27;2(14):1998–2007. doi: 10.1039/C3TB21595D

Table 3.

Compressive modulus of Lamellar Scaffold and Equiaxed Scaffold. *Significantly different from compression modulusparallel to the lamellae; # Significantly different from Lamellar Scaffold (p<0.05). (n=4)

Sample Apatite content (wt%) Freezing condition Porosity % Lamellar spacing or pore size (μm) Compression modulus (MPa)-parallel to the lamellae Compression modulus (MPa)-perpendicular to the lamellae
Lamellar Scaffold 35 −25 °C, unidirectionally 94 ± 5.8 173 ± 45.4 36.4 ± 10.0 1.87 ± 0.32 *
Equiaxed Scaffold 35 −25 °C, nondirectionally 92 ± 4.7 82.3 ±15.1 18.0 ± 1.72 # 17.4 ± 3.35 #