Table 3.
Compressive modulus of Lamellar Scaffold and Equiaxed Scaffold. *Significantly different from compression modulusparallel to the lamellae; # Significantly different from Lamellar Scaffold (p<0.05). (n=4)
| Sample | Apatite content (wt%) | Freezing condition | Porosity % | Lamellar spacing or pore size (μm) | Compression modulus (MPa)-parallel to the lamellae | Compression modulus (MPa)-perpendicular to the lamellae |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lamellar Scaffold | 35 | −25 °C, unidirectionally | 94 ± 5.8 | 173 ± 45.4 | 36.4 ± 10.0 | 1.87 ± 0.32 * |
| Equiaxed Scaffold | 35 | −25 °C, nondirectionally | 92 ± 4.7 | 82.3 ±15.1 | 18.0 ± 1.72 # | 17.4 ± 3.35 # |