Table 5.
Results of 12S marker analysis
| Sample name | 12S consensus sequence | Identified species | Percentage similarity |
|---|---|---|---|
| A1 |
✓ |
Canis lupus laniger, Canis lupus chanco and Canis lupus familiaris |
98% match |
| A2 |
✓ |
Canis lupus laniger, Canis lupus chanco and Canis lupus familiaris |
98% match |
| A3 |
✓ |
Canis lupus laniger, Canis lupus chanco and Canis lupus familiaris |
98% match |
| A4 |
✓ |
Canis lupus laniger, Canis lupus chanco and Canis lupus familiaris |
98% match |
| A5 |
✓ |
Homo sapiens |
93% match |
| B1 |
✓ |
Homo sapiens |
93% match |
| B2 |
✓ |
Homo sapiens |
93% match |
| B3 |
✓ |
Homo sapiens |
93% match |
| B4 |
= |
Not available |
|
| B5 |
= |
Not available |
|
| B6 |
✓ |
Canis lupus laniger, Canis lupus chanco and Canis lupus familiaris |
98% match |
| B7 | ✓ | Felis silvestris catus | 100% match |
Species identification of fur samples and percentage of similarity after research conducted using the BLAST tool. ✓ success in obtaining the consensus sequence; = failure in obtaining the consensus sequence.