Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 2.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Nov 8;58(20):2076–2083. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.022

Table 4.

Relative risk for incident and mean change in CAC score among participants with discoordinate risk prediction scores. Adjusted for race, MESA site and follow-up duration.

Incident CAC Scores
Relative Risk Ratio
(95% CI)
CAC Score Change
(AU) Regression
coefficient (95% CI)
RRS <10% & FRS<10% (n=3478) 1 (ref group) 0 (ref)
RRS <10% & FRS≥10% (n=336) 1.48 (0.98–3.72) 13 (3, 23)
RRS >10% & FRS<10% (n=369) 2.42 (1.57–3.72) 22 (14, 31)
RRS ≥10% & FRS≥10% (n=957) 2.74 (2.01–3.72) 24 (17, 29)