Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Alzheimer Res. 2014 Feb;11(2):182–191. doi: 10.2174/1567205010666131212120443

Table 3.

Candidates discriminant variables derived from penetrance analysis.

Variable APOE Status Statistics
E4− E4+ χ2 t
Hemisferic Pattern atrophy (% (N))
Lelf 34.7 (35) 8.8 (3) 0.013
Right 10.9(11) 11.8(1)
Symmetric 54.5 (55) 79.4 (27)
Predominant Brain atrophy (% (N))
Frontal 17.8(18) 32.4(11) 0.082
Temporal 31.7(32) 20.6 (7)
Parietal 3.0 (3) 11.8(4)
Fronto-temporal 30.7(31) 23.5(8)
Fronto-parietal 3.0(3) 5.9 (2)
Global 13.9(14) 5.9(2)
Initial symptom reported by caregiver (% (N))
Memory 35(41) 50 (20) 0.094
Behavior 41.4(46) 64.1 (25) 0.015
Language 53.2 (59) 33.3(13) 0.033
Pathological background (% (N))
Dyslipemia 32.8(38) 47.5(19) 0.095
Neurological exploration (% (N))
Sucking 1(1) 5.7 (2) 0.092
Normal gait 66.4 (75) 81.6(31) 0.076
Altered gait 33.6(38) 18.4(7)
Neuropsychological exploration. Quantitative evaluation (average)
Visual Naming (15-BNT) 10.42±3.96 12.09±3.34 0.036
Verbal comprehemsion 4.91±1.3 5.53±0.96 0.006
Semantic verbal fluency 8.48±4.55 11.03±3.94 0.005
Similarities WAIS-III 5.49±3.50 7.34±3.60 0.016
Neuropsychological exploration. Qualitative evaluation impaired (% (N))
Poppelreuter test 48.2(41) 21.2(7) 0.007
Digit Span Forward WAIS-III 72.2 (65) 54.5(18) 0.064

χ2 = Pearson Chi-square

t= Levene for equality of variances