Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 26;6(4):307–324. doi: 10.1007/s11571-011-9183-8

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Example push-pull inhibitory eDOG model responses for flashing (F pg(d pg,0)) and patch-grating (F pg(d pg,2πνpg)) spots, cf. Eqs. 3839. a Flashing-spot response as a function of spot diameter. Solid line: C = 0, i.e., standard DOG. Dashed line: C =  −1.5, c = 0.83 deg. Dotted line: Variation of push-pull inhibitory eDOG model with the Gaussian loop-kernel replaced with a function of the type in Eq. 24 with the constant Inline graphic, Inline graphic deg Inline graphic deg and σn = 0; DOG parameters are A 1 = 1, a 1 = 0.25 deg, A 2 = 0.85, and a 2 = 0.83 deg. b Patch-grating response for νpg = 0.3 cycles/deg as a function of spot diameter d pg for the same models considered in upper left panel. c Thin lines: Full-field grating response as a function of spatial frequency ν of the grating. Thick lines: Patch-grating response for d pg = 0.8 deg as a function of spatial frequency νpg of the patch grating. Same models and parameters as in upper panels