Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 3;4:5547. doi: 10.1038/srep05547

Figure 6. ksum has good performance in identifying influential spreaders.

Figure 6

The comparisons of kS with ksum and k2sum are shown for LJ (a, b), APS (c, d), Facebook (e, f) and Twitter (g, h). Error bars indicate the 95% confidence intervals. To our surprise ksum has performance comparable with kS. With more local information, k2sum improve the performance slightly.