Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 3.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014 Jun;16(6):489. doi: 10.1007/s11886-014-0489-0

Table 1.

Comparing US FDA authorization of drugs and devices

Drugs High-risk devices Medium-risk devices
Year FDA began mandating proof of safety and efficacy 1962 1976 N/A
Authorization process New drug application (NDA) Premarket approval (PMA) 510(k) clearance
Standard of evidence Substantial evidence that the drug will have the effect it purports or is represented to havea Reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness Substantial equivalence to a predicate device
Supporting data Clinical trials and pre-clinical studies Clinical trials and pre-clinical studies Pre-clinical studiesb
Process for introducing post-authorization changes Nonec PMA supplement pathways New 510(k) clearance
Tort liability claims against manufacturer mostly preempted? No Yes No
a

Substantial evidence is defined as “adequate and well-controlled investigations, including clinical investigations”

b

Clinical trials are rarely required as part of the 510(k) process

c

Changes to the molecular structure of an active ingredient require their own New Drug Application. In some instances, the FDA may approve new formulations of an approved drug based on bioequivalence studies