Table 3.
Characteristics of studies that focused on physical pipe integrity.a
Study | Location | Source water | Treatment plant | Distribution system | Design | Exposure | Comparison exposure | Outcome assessment | Effect estimate (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D’Argenio et al. 1995 | Italy | Not reported | Not reported | Presumed to be continuously operated; some chlorine residual; total coliforms, fecal coliforms, and fecal streptococci detected in affected pipe segment | Cohort | Pipeline with fecal contamination from cross-connections | Pipeline with no fecal contamination | Self-report | RR = 2.67 (1.16, 6.11)b |
Mohanty et al. 2002 | India | Surface water | Conventional treatment with chlorination | Intermittently operated; inadequate residual; total and fecal coliforms detected | Ecological | Unit increase in percentage of cast-iron pipes in service zone | NA | Self-report | Regression coefficient, –0.42 (p = 0.10) |
Yassin et al. 2006 | Palestine | Groundwater | Chlorination | Intermittently operated; inadequate residual; fecal contamination detected more often than at the source | Cross-sectional | Network > 1 year old | Network ≤ 1 year old | Self-report | RR = 1.51 (0.80, 2.83)b |
Abu Amr and Yassin 2008 | Palestine | Groundwater | Chlorination | Intermittently operated; inadequate residual; fecal contamination detected more often than at the source | Cross-sectional | Network > 1 year old | Network ≤ 1 year old | Self-report | RR = 1.03 (0.68, 1.56)b |
Nygård et al. 2004 | Sweden | Surface and groundwater | Chlorination (for surface water only) | Presumed to be continuously operated; low-level residual | Ecological | 10-m increase in pipe length per person in municipality | NA | Surveillance records | IDR = 1.12 (1.08, 1.16) |
Tinker et al. 2009 | USA | Not reported | Not reported | Presumed to be continuously operated; adequate residual | Ecological | ZIP code with long hydraulic residence time | ZIP code with intermediate hydraulic residence time | Emergency department records | OR = 1.06 (1.04, 1.08)c |
Abbreviations: IDR, incidence density ratio; NA, not applicable; OR, odds ratio; RR, relative risk. aResults not pooled. bCalculated from data reported in the study. cPooled from estimates for two utilities reported in the study. |