Table 2.
Finalization of themes after deductive and inductive reasoning
Status of a priori themes after deductive reasoning | |
---|---|
A priori themes retained as such | |
1. |
Awareness |
2. |
Self-evaluation |
3. |
Helpful relationships |
4. |
Perceived seriousness |
5. |
Personal modifiers |
6. |
Attitude |
A priori
themes retained with modifications | |
1. |
Identifying stages-of-change: the definition modified to identify only three stages: pre-contemplation, intention and action |
2. |
Household efficacy: modification of ‘self-efficacy’ |
3. |
Decisional balance: combination of ‘perceived pros and cons’, ‘perceived benefits’ and ‘perceived barriers’ |
4. |
Substitution opportunities: modification of ‘substitution’ |
5. |
Perceived risk: modification of ‘perceived susceptibility’ |
6. |
Perceived societal response: modification of ‘subjective norms’ |
7. |
Cues to action: modification of ‘perceived facilitators’ |
Excluded a priori themes | |
1. |
Emotional reaction |
2. |
Effect of behaviour on others |
3. |
Social alternatives for the disadvantaged |
4. |
Identifying temptations |
5. |
Reinforcement or rewards |
6. |
Commitment |
7. |
Goal setting |
New themes identified after inductive reasoning | |
1. |
Accessibility |
2. |
Perceived needs and preferences |
3. |
Societal norms |
4. | Perceived household response |