Table 1.
Observed variable | Item | Factorloading* | Cronbach's alpha | Composite reliability | Average variance extracted |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Attitude | AT1 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.64 |
AT2 | 0.87 | ||||
AT3 | 0.77 | ||||
AT4 | 0.70 | ||||
Intention to use | IU1 | 0.70 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.70 |
IU2 | 0.87 | ||||
IU3 | 0.92 | ||||
IU4 | 0.83 | ||||
Perceived ease of use | PEOU1 | 0.94 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.87 |
PEOU2 | 0.96 | ||||
PEOU3 | 0.92 | ||||
PEOU4 | 0.92 | ||||
Perceived usefulness | PU1 | 0.82 | 0.91 | 0.89 | 0.68 |
PU2 | 0.69 | ||||
PU3 | 0.83 | ||||
PU4 | 0.94 | ||||
Perceived affective quality | PAQ1 | 0.71 | 0.87 | 0.88 | 0.72 |
PAQ2 | 0.86 | ||||
PAQ3 | 0.95 | ||||
Perceived control | PC1 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.87 | 0.62 |
PC2 | 0.83 | ||||
PC3 | 0.78 | ||||
PC4 | 0.79 |
All item loadings were significant at p<0.001.