Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 3.
Published in final edited form as: J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2012 Feb;23(1):191–203. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2012.0010

Table 3.

LOGISTICS REGRESSION MODELS OF CONSISTENT CONDOM USE (LOWER AND UPPER 95% LIMITS)

Explanatory variable Unadjusted odds ratio
(95% CI)
Adjusted odds ratio
(95% CI)
Gender
 Males 1 1
 Females 1.00 (.65, 1.52) 1.34 (.80, 2.23)
Age Range (years)
 18–29 1*** 1**
 30–39 2.05 (1.2, 3.47)** 2.55 (1.43, 4.55)**
 40–65 2.54 (1.41, 4.58)** 3.45 (1.74, 6.86)**
Education (years)
 0–7 1 1
 7 or more .81 (.54, 1.21) .84 (.54, 1.29)
Employment status
 Unemployed/other 1 1
 House maker 1.05 (.56, 1.98) 1.03 (.49, 2.16)
 Petty trader 1.28 (.71, 2.34) 1.28 (.68, 2.4)
 Skilled Labor .86 (.47, 1.57) .86 (.46, 1.60)
Marital status
 Single 1 1
 Married 1.01 (.59, 1.72) .59 (.31, 1.10)
 Not Married .95 (.50, 1.82) 60 (.29, 1.24)
Knowledge of partner’s HIV status
 Aware 1*** 1*
 Unaware .47 (.31, .70) .43 (.28, .66)***
Number of Children
 No children 1 1
  or more 1.13 (.68, 1.89) .85 (.47, 1.54)
*

p value <.05

**

p value <.01

***

p value <.001

CI = Confidence Interval