Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 10;171(13):3298–3312. doi: 10.1111/bph.12685

Table 1.

Effects of heparin on IP3-evoked Ca2+ release and IP3 binding

Functional analysis aBinding pEC50(IP3)-pKD(heparin)
IP3 or AdA heparin heparin
pEC50 pKD pKD
IP3R1 IP3 7.47 ± 0.02 5.39 ± 0.00 4.66 2.08 ± 0.02
IP3R1 AdA 8.35 ± 0.03 5.16 ± 0.05
IP3R2 IP3 6.82 ± 0.04 4.66 ± 0.07 4.62 2.16 ± 0.09*
IP3R3 IP3 6.66 ± 0.07 5.55 ± 0.09 5.34 1.11 ± 0.08*
IP3R3 AdA 7.71 ± 0.01 5.68 ± 0.04

From experiments similar to those shown in Figures 1 and 2, AdA or IP3-evoked Ca2+ release and their sensitivity to heparin were used to determine pEC50 (as M) and pKD (as g mL−1) for DT40 cells expressing IP3R1, IP3R2 or IP3R3. Results are means ± SEM from three independent experiments (six for IP3R3).

a

The affinities for heparin determined from equilibrium-competition binding with 3H-IP3 to Sf9 membranes expressing IP3R1-3 are reproduced from (Nerou et al., 2001). The batch of heparin used for those binding studies was different from that used for the work reported here. The final column (derived from the results shown in Figures 1B,C and 2A–D) shows paired comparisons of pEC50(IP3) – pKD(heparin) as a means of reporting the relative effectiveness with which heparin might be expected to block IP3-evoked Ca2+ release via different IP3R subtypes. The results suggest that IP3R3 is likely to be substantially more susceptible to inhibition than IP3R1 or IP3R2.

*

Denotes a value significantly different from IP3R1 in the final column (P < 0.05).