Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 3;9(7):e100901. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100901

Table 1. Epoch numbers in the different conditions, for the GPs and PPs groups.

PPs GPs t(df), p value
Native phoneme standards 156.86±15.84* 126±4.75 t(28) = 1.97, p = 0.06
Native phoneme deviants 85.29±8.15* 72.94±2.88 t(28) = 1.50, p = 0.15
Unknown phoneme standards 156.71±13.98* 130.94±3.30 t(28) = 1.91, p = 0.07
Unknown phoneme deviants 89.14±7.63* 76.13±1.91 t(28) = 1.76, p = 0.09
Frequency standards 727.57±20.34 731.93±52.26 t(27)<1, p = 0.77
Frequency deviants 98.64±1.82 98.86±6.24 t(27)<1, p = 0.89
Duration standards 749.84±108.87 722.93±36.26 t(27)<1, p = 0.37
Duration deviants 102.69±14.48 98.62±6.50 t(27) = 1.01, p = 0.35
Pattern standards 415.57±54.44 397.12±6.25 t(28) = 1.34, p = 0.22
Pattern deviants 415.71±54.68 397.18±6.30 t(28) = 1.34, p = 0.21

*For the spectral analysis, the number of segments for the PPs was randomly selected to match the number of segments for the GPs: 135.35±7.11 native phoneme standards, 77.35±6.14 native phoneme deviants, 136.14±10.02 unknown phoneme standards and 79.42±4.5 unknown phoneme deviants. There were no differences between the groups in the number of segments for any phoneme stimulus (for all t-tests t<1).