Table 3.
Comparisons between receiver operating characteristic curves n (%)
| Staging system | AUROC 1 yr | AUROC 2 yr |
| (95%CI) [P value] | (95%CI) (P value) | |
| OKUDA | 0.492 (0.410-0.574) [0.849] | 0.547 (0.478-0.615) [0.185] |
| CLIP | 0.632 (0.548-0.716) [0.002]1 | 0.603 (0.536-0.670) [0.003] |
| BCLC | 0.600 (0.524-0.676) [0.018] | 0.571 (0.502-0.639) [0.045] |
| TOKYO | 0.541 (0.457-0.626) [0.324] | 0.582 (0.514-0.650) [0.020] |
| JIS | 0.658 (0.582-0.734) [< 0.001]2 | 0.576 (0.508-0.644) [0.031] |
Significant differences between curves:
1
CLIP vs OKUDA;
2
JIS vs OKUDA. AUROC: Area under the curve; CLIP: Cancer of the Liver Italian Program; BCLC: Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; JIS: Japanese Integrated System.