Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 3;11:E112. doi: 10.5888/pcd11.140125

Table 3. Relationship of Personal Characteristics and Perceived Environmental Factors to Public Transportation Use Among Adults (N = 772) in St. Louis, Missouri.

Personal Characteristics and Perceived Environmental Factors Public Transportation Use
1–4 Days/Week
≥5 Days/Week
OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Personal characteristics
Sex
Male 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Female 1.21 (0.81–1.83) 1.23 (0.71–2.14)
Age, y
18–29 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
30–39 1.00 (0.53–1.90) 0.95 (0.43–2.08)
40–49 1.34 (0.90–2.56) 0.93 (0.41–2.13)
50–59 1.98 (1.06–3.70) 1.69 (0.80–3.57)
≥60 0.86 (0.45–1.62) 0.34 (0.14–0.86)
Income, $
<10,000 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
10,000–29,999 0.56 (0.35–0.92) 0.84 (0.45–1.57)
30,000–49,999 0.27 (0.13–0.51) 0.49 (0.23–1.03)
50,000–69,999 0.28 (0.13–0.58) 0.51 (0.21–1.20)
≥70,000 0.40 (0.24–0.70) 0.10 (0.03–0.34)
Employment status
Unemployed 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Employed 0.56 (0.35–0.92) 2.99 (1.52–5.90)
Perceived environmental factors
Speed of traffic
Disagree 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Agree 0.54 (0.36–0.81) 0.76 (0.44–1.32)
Perceived nearby crime
Disagree 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Agree 1.06 (0.67–1.69) 0.50 (0.28–0.87)
Safety from crime when walking during the day
Disagree 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Agree 1.15 (0.73–1.82) 0.77 (0.41–1.43)
Safety from crime when walking at night
Disagree 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Agree 0.91 (0.53–1.58) 0.59 (0.29–1.18)
Accessibility to sidewalks
Disagree 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Agree 0.59 (0.30–1.16) 3.00 (0.69–13.12)
Number of destinations within a 10-min walk
0 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
1–5 1.52 (0.72–3.23) 2.86 (0.78–10.49)
6–10 1.37 (0.61–3.10) 2.22 (0.57–8.60)
≥11 0.74 (0.30–1.81) 1.50 (0.36–6.30)

Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.