Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychooncology. 2014 Feb 3;23(7):812–819. doi: 10.1002/pon.3488

Table 4.

Logistic regression analyses predicting preferences for addressing emotional concerns

Bivariate Analyses Multivariate Analyses

Outcome Predictors B Wald χ2 Odds ratio 95% CI for odds ratio B Wald χ2 Odds ratio 95% CI for odds ratio
See a counselor
Age −.04* 5.43 .96 .93 to .99 −.04* 4.85 .96 .93 to 1.00
White racea −.85* 4.55 .43 .20 to .93 −.79* 3.78 .45 .20 to 1.01
Difficulty traveling to appointments .39* 3.92 1.48 1.00 to 2.17 .40* 3.98 1.49 1.01 to 2.19
See a spiritual leader
Income −.27* 6.04 .77 .61 to .95 −.22* 3.94 .80 .64 to 1.00
Religious affiliationa 1.13* 4.26 3.09 1.06 to 9.04 1.22* 4.09 3.38 1.04 to 11.00
Talk to primary care physician
Education (years) −.22** 9.79 .80 .70 to .92 −.21* 6.08 .81 .69 to .96
Income −.26* 3.82 .77 .59 to 1.00 −.04 .06 .96 .71 to 1.31
Health insurancea −1.67* 3.89 .19 .04 to .99 −1.35 2.39 .26 .05 to 1.44
See a community member with personal cancer experience
Anxiety .08* 3.83 1.09 1.00 to 1.18
Wait for it to get better
Difficulty traveling to appointments .67** 10.74 1.96 1.31 to 2.94

Note. CI = confidence interval. For all chi-square analyses, df = 1. Recruitment location was a control variable in all analyses (omitted from the table). For the preference to see a counselor, ns = 163–164; for the preference to see a spiritual leader, ns = 156–164; for the preference to talk to a primary care physician, ns = 156–164; for the preference to see a community member with personal cancer experience, n = 161; for the preference to wait for it to get better, n = 160.

a

Coded 0 = no, 1 = yes.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.