Table 5.

Non-adjusted and adjusted prevalence ratios (PR) and confidence intervals (95% CI) for the association of social mobility with the healthy, bar and energy dense dietary patterns identified in 23 to 25-year-old adults of the Ribeirão Preto birth cohort (4th phase: 2002–2004)

Social mobility	Healthy pattern		Bar pattern		Energy dense pattern
	Non-adjusted PR (95% CI)	Adjusted PR (95% CI) a	Non-adjusted PR (95% CI)	Adjusted PR (95% CI) b	Non-adjusted PR (95% CI)	Adjusted PR (95% CI) c
	p = 0.001	p = 0.541	p = 0.185	p = 0.622	p = 0.331	p = 0.664
Poor – poor	Reference	Reference	Reference	Reference	Reference	Reference
Poor – not poor	1.08 (0.73 – 1.58)	0.93 (0.68 – 1.26)	1.18 (0.81 – 1.73)	1.09 (0.82 – 1.46)	1.14 (0.78 – 1.66)	1.11 (0.83 – 1.48)
Not poor – poor	0.91 (0.59 – 1.41)	0.82 (0.58 – 1.17)	0.95 (0.62 – 1.45)	0.88 (0.64 – 1.22)	0.92 (0.61 – 1.41)	0.97 (0.70 – 1.33)
Not poor – not poor	1.62 (1.19 – 2.22)	1.01 (0.76 – 1.36)	1.31 (0.96 – 1.80)	0.99 (0.75 – 1.33)	1.23 (0.90 – 1.69)	1.13 (0.86 – 1.49)

Total n = 1,549, n of men = 769, n of women = 780.

p value for trend referring to the maximum likelihood ratio test obtained by Poisson regression.

^a Adjusted for sex, skin color, maternal schooling at birth, schooling in adulthood, marital status and presence of children in the household.

^b Adjusted for sex, maternal schooling at birth, schooling in adulthood, marital status and number of people in the household.

^c Adjusted for skin color.