Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Attach Hum Dev. 2013 Dec 12;16(2):149–173. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2013.863734

Table 5.

Correlations between Maternal Behaviors in the Reunion Episode of the Still-Face Procedure and AAI States of Mind Scales

Engagement Intrusive Withdraw Monitor Sensitivity
Maternal Idealizationa −.11 −.12 −.06 .23** −.11
Paternal Idealizationa −.07 −.10 −.03 .12 −.05
Maternal Angerb .01 .02 .13* −.05 −.09
Paternal Angerb −.03 .12 −.03 .01 −.03
Maternal Derogation −.03 .07 −.02 −.05 −.03
Paternal Derogation −.06 .02 −.04 .04 −.00
Overall Derogationa −.06 .04 −.03 .01 −.04
Lack of Memorya −.15 −.09 −.04 .22** −.13
Passivityb −.01 .14* .08 .02 −.02
Metacognitive Monitoring .11 −.02 .01 −.07 .12
Unresolved Loss −.08 .09 .01 .04 −.04
Unresolved Traumab −.30 .05 .15 .13 −.12
Coherence of Transcript .18* −.01 −.02 −.23** .28**
Coherence of Mindab .20** −.04 −.02 −.22** .28**

Note: There was no AAI fear of loss variation in this sample. AAI State of Mind scales denoted with the superscript a comprise the dismissing dimension. AAI State of Mind scales denoted with the superscript b comprise the preoccupied dimension (see Haltigan, Leerkes, et al., 2013 for more details).

**

p < .01;

*

p < .05.