Table 1.
Descriptive data
| Universal | Targeted risk: referred | Targeted risk: adjudicated | Overall | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample size | 266 | 213 | 242 | 721 |
| Percent female | 52 %* | 36 % | 36 % | 42 % |
| Mean age (SD) | 13.4 (0.68)* | 13.8 (0.76)+ | 14.7 (1.38) ‡ | 14.0 (1.14) |
| Percent born in the U.S. | 40.2 % | 56.1 % | 65.3 %‡ | 53.4 % |
| Mean baseline internalizing symptoms (SD) | 3.25 (3.63)* | 6.55 (5.35) | 5.68 (5.34) | 5.04 (4.98) |
| % baseline Major Depressive Disorder-MDDa (SE) | 9.6 (1.6)*b | 20.6 (2.8) | 21.2 (2.6) | 13.4 (1.8)b |
| Mean baseline conduct disorder (SD) | 5.73 (7.86)* | 15.36 (10.92) | 13.47 (11.28) | 11.18 (10.88) |
| Mean baseline socialized aggression (SD) | 1.81 (5.68)* | 5.27 (5.99) | 6.19 (7.32) | 4.31 (6.64) |
| Mean baseline attention problems (SD) | 4.70 (6.01)* | 12.68 (8.41) | 10.76 (8.79) | 9.10 (8.47) |
| Mean baseline motor excess (SD) | 1.35 (1.90)* | 3.16 (2.75) | 2.75 (2.79) | 2.36 (2.61) |
| Mean baseline parent-adolescent communication (SD) | 77.42 (8.89)* | 69.92 (10.62) | 69.78 (11.42) | 72.63 (10.93) |
Pairwise comparison analysis with Tukey's correction indicates this mean is significantly different than means from Referred and Adjudicated samples (p <001)
Significantly different from Universal and Adjudicated samples
Significantly different from Universal and Referred samplesb
Percentage reaching Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) diagnosis cut-point on DISC Predictive Scale (Lucas et al. 2001). Note that only the Referred and Adjudicated samples were administered the DISC Predictive Scale
Because the DISC Predictive Scale is not available for the Universal sample, this is the estimated probability of reaching MDD diagnosis cut-point at mean level of baseline internalizing symptoms (i.e., 3.25). Logistic regression analysis was conducted with baseline internalizing symptoms as predictor and MDD Diagnosis at the outcome, using data from the combined Referred and Adjudicated samples