Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Prev Sci. 2014 Dec;15(6):917–928. doi: 10.1007/s11121-013-0448-9

Table 4.

Mediation model parameter estimates, standard errors, and significance values

b (se); p value
Mediator: Post-Intervention Communication on Baseline Communication
Universal –0.085 (0.119); 0.476
Targeted Risk: Referred 0.073 (0.126); 0.561
Targeted Risk: Adjudicated 0.297 (0.112); 0.008
Intervention Condition –20.627 (4.863); < 0.001
Baseline Communication x Intervention 0.252 (0.065); < 0.001
Outcome: Internalizing Trajectory Slope on Baseline Internalizing (latent) –0.464 (0.362); 0.199
Age –0.342 (0.205); 0.096
Gender 0.259 (0.287); 0.366
Baseline Communication 0.068 (0.045); 0.132
Intervention Condition 3.805 (1.928); 0.048
Post-Intervention Communication –0.057 (0.018); 0.002
Baseline Communication x Intervention –0.046 (0.026); 0.074
Baseline Internalizing on Age
Universal 0.073 (0.072); 0.309
Targeted Risk: Referred 0.173 (0.092); 0.061
Targeted Risk: Adjudicated –0.107 (0.053); 0.043
Gender –0.202 (0.074); 0.006
Average Indirect Effect 0.126a (0.057); 0.021
a

Average indirect effect: a*b=[-20.63+0.252*(mean baseline FC=72.63)]*[-0.054]=0.126