Table 2.
Correlations of individual variables with IBB score.
Variable | r (all subjects) | r2 (all subjects) | r (no shams) | r2 (no shams) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual force | −0.96 | 0.93 | −0.75 | 0.56 |
Tissue displacement | −0.83 | 0.70 | −0.09 | 0.01 |
Abnormal paw PL | −0.87 | 0.75 | −0.69 | 0.48 |
Grooming | 0.85 | 0.73 | 0.47 | 0.22 |
Forelimb open field | 0.66 | 0.43 | 0.67 | 0.45 |
LF step distribution | −0.21 | 0.04 | −0.31 | 0.10 |
LF stride length | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.34 | 0.12 |
LF print area | 0.32 | 0.10 | 0.42 | 0.17 |
RF step distribution | −0.55 | 0.31 | −0.27 | 0.08 |
RF stride length | 0.37 | 0.14 | 0.67 | 0.45 |
RF print area | 0.29 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.00 |
Total sparing | 0.93 | 0.87 | 0.55 | 0.30 |
WM sparing | 0.89 | 0.79 | 0.61 | 0.37 |
GM sparing | 0.88 | 0.77 | 0.06 | 0.00 |
Motorneuron sparing | 0.68 | 0.46 | 0.27 | 0.07 |
Note that separate correlations were calculated for all injury conditions (all subjects) and excluding shams (no shams). Note that Pearson correlations (r) and shared variance (r2) deflated without shams, indicating a smaller but often still significant dynamic range within different injury conditions. This suggests that the IBB has sensitivity across a wide dynamic range of injury conditions. Note: rcrit = 0.31 for p < 0.05.