Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 15;58(2):2251. doi: 10.4081/ejh.2014.2251

Table 2.

Comparison of respective frequencies of the eleven histopathologic abnormalities in our ovarian dysplasia scoring system.

Histopathological items Group A
(n= 40)
Group B
(n=15)
Group C
(n=116)
P
Epithelial pseudostratification 23 (57.5%) 10 (66.6%) 54 (46.5%) P1=0.240
P2=0.032
P3=0.750
Epithelial proliferation 12 (30%) 11 (73.3%) 35 (30.1%) P1=0.930
P2=0.002
P3=0.003
Surface papillomatosis 14 (35%) 9 (60%) 27 (23.2%) P1=0.1200
P2=0.0070
P3=0.0074
Irregular nuclear chromatine pattern 13 (32.5%) 7 (46.6%) 21 (18.1%) P1=0.054
P2=0.0072
P3=0.07
Irregular nuclear contour 7 (17.5%) 7 (46.6%) 35 (30.1%) P1=0.371
P2=0.060
P3=0.0071
Cellular pleiomorphism 13 (32.5%) 8 (53.3%) 36 (31%) P1=0.515
P2=0.006
P3=0.007
Increase in nuclear size 5 (12.5%) 7 (46.6%) 22 (18.9%) P1=0.5130
P2=0.0038
P3=0.0025
Inclusion cysts 24 (60%) 10 (66.6%) 60 (51.7%) P1=0.196
P2=0.12
P3=0.82
Deep epithelial invaginations 17 (42.5%) 13 (86.6%) 42 (36.2%) P1=0.324
P2=0.012
P3=0.019
Psammoma 22 (55%) 6 (40%) 13 (11.2%) P1<0.001
P2=0.0052
P3=0.74
Stromal hyperplasia 28 (70%) 13 (86.6%) 29 (25%) P1<0.0001
P2<0.00001
P3=0.24

P1, statistical differences between group A and C; P2, statistical differences between group B and C; P3, statistical differences between group A and B.