Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 15;58(2):2251. doi: 10.4081/ejh.2014.2251

Table 3.

Comparison of respective frequencies of the seven histopathologic abnormalities in our tubal dysplasia scoring system.

Histopathological items Group A
(n= 40)
Group B
(n=15)
Group C
(n=116)
P
Epithelial pseudostratification 36 (90%) 13 (86.6%) 56 (48.2%) P1=0.0001
P2=0.0002
P3=0.82
Tufting 32 (80%) 13 (86.6%) 13 (11.2%) P1<0.0001
P2<0.0001
P3=0.9100
Loss of nuclear polarity 36 (90%) 12 (80%) 26 (22.4%) P1<0.0001
P2=0.003
P3=0.76
Increase in nuclear density 35 (87.5%) 7 (46.6%) 14 (12%) P1<0.0001
P2=0.0015
P3=0.011
Nuclear atypia 20 (50%) 12 (80%) 11 (9.4%) P1<0.0001
P2<0.0001
P3=0.021
Nucleomegaly 34 (85%) 10 (66.6%) 14 (12%) P1<0.0001
P2<0.0001
P3=0.12
Loss of ciliation 34 (85%) 12 (80%) 7 (6%) P1<0.0001
P2<0.0001
P3=0.89

P1, statistical differences between group A and C; P2, statistical differences between group B and C; P3, statistical differences between group A and B.