Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 7.
Published in final edited form as: Urban Aff Rev Thousand Oaks Calif. 2009 Apr 9;44(6):779–806. doi: 10.1177/1078087409334163

Appendix Table H.

The sources of Density Zoning in 49 MSAs

Density Zoning Score 2003 Measure
Year of Statehood 0.0120*** 0.00489 0.0101***
(0.00202) (0.00382) (0.00351)
No. of Rural Housing Units in 1990/Land Area -0.0365*** −0.0279*** −0.0193* −0.0158***
(0.00580) (0.00698) (0.0101) (0.00570)
% Black 1990 −1.709** −0.718 0.0122
(0.728) (0.966) (1.342)
no. of General Govts in 1962 −0.00213*** −0.00200*** −0.000276
(0.000674) (0.000611) (0.000764)
% of Local Government’s Revenue from Own Source 1992 0.987
(1.340)
State Taxation Per Capita −0.000641**
(0.000254)
Share of Local Revenue from Own Source (State average) 0.99
(1.34)
Property Tax Share of Local Revenue (state average) −0.903 −0.877
(0.606) (0.585)

Constant −18.54*** 4.133*** 4.797*** −4.486 −16.38**
(3.669) (0.123) (0.289) (7.159) (6.696)
F-statistic 35 39 19 15 41
Observations 49 49 49 49 49
Adjusted R-squared 0.407 0.461 0.560 0.573 0.840

Robust standard errors in parentheses, clustered on MSAs.

***

p<0.01,

**

p<0.05,

*

p<0.1.

Column 5 was used as the first stage of the 2SLS regressions from Table 4. It contains the following controls: population density, the share of adults over 25 with a BA, the manufacturing share of industry, the median household income, the water-to-land ratio, a dummy for coastal proximity, the agricultural share of industry, the share of commuters with commute times over 35 minutes, population growth in the previous 10 years, the ratio of suburban to central city housing units, the median rent, the suburban to central city rent ratio, the share of homes with no plumbing, the rural share of housing units.