Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Infect Control. 2014 Apr 13;42(6):626–631. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.01.027

Table 2. Comparison of Selected Susceptibility Profiles of Gram-Negative Bacilli Causing Healthcare-associated Infections among Case and Control Subjects.

Antimicrobial Agent Case Subjects (n=103) Control Subjects (n=195)
Susceptible n/Na (%) Susceptible n/Na (%)
Amikacin 15/96 (15) 193/195 (99)
Cefepime 7/98 (7) 166/193 (86)
Ciprofloxacin 0/50 (0) 86/96 (90)
Gentamicin 16/102 (16) 178/196 (91)
Imipenem 1/67 (1) 129/142 (91)
Levofloxacin 0/102 (0) 167/195 (86)
Meropenem 6/82 (7) 127/140 (91)
Piperacillin-tazobactam 1/51 (2) 76/87 (87)
Polymyxin Bb 75/83 (90) 14/14 (100)
Tigecyclinec 58/85 (68) 5/9 (56)
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 1/101 (1) 100/121 (83)
Tobramycin 3/82 (4) 162/170 (95)
a

n= number susceptible isolates and N= number of isolates with available results

b

Interpretive criteria do not exist for the Enterobacteriacae when testing polymyxin B; therefore, the susceptible breakpoint of ≤2 μg/mL approved for P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. was employed for these organisms.

c

Interpretive criteria do not exist for the Acinetobacter spp. when testing tigecycline; therefore, the susceptible breakpoint of ≤2 μg/mL approved for Enterobacteriacae was employed for these organisms.