Table 1.
Estimated 2009 mean bundle prices by Carnegie type
Publisher | Research 1, $ | Research 2, $ | Master’s, $ |
Elsevier | 1,159,137 | 366,771 | 89,190 |
Springer | 382,286 | 184,583 | 52,692 |
Wiley | 329,535 | 94,072 | 30,726 |
Taylor & Francis* | 299,712 | 72,536 | n.a. |
Sage | 114,015 | 61,378 | 26,586 |
ACS | 62,743 | 42,119 | 22,227 |
OUP | 61,602 | 28,253 | 4,543 |
CUP | 37,395 | 19,725 | 9,592 |
Emerald† | 24,462 | 7,590 | 6,661 |
Our sample of Taylor & Francis contracts consists of only five research 1 institutions and one research 2 institution. We used a simple regression of expenditures on full-time equivalent enrollment to estimate average costs for research 1 institutions. We used actual expenditures on the single research 2 institution (University of Montana) for which we had a contract. n.a, not available.
We observed only three Emerald contracts with research 2 institutions and only one (with the California State University library consortium) for master’s institutions. Thus, we simply used sample means to estimate mean expenditures for research 2 and master’s institutions for Emerald.