Table 2. Hypothetical (extreme) examples for ranking treatments with maximum (left) and minimal (right) imprecision.
Network ranking with high imprecision | Network ranking with high precision | |||||||
A | B | C | D | A | B | C | D | |
Best | 28 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 97 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Second | 24 | 28 | 24 | 24 | 1 | 97 | 1 | 1 |
Third | 24 | 24 | 28 | 24 | 1 | 1 | 97 | 1 |
Last | 24 | 24 | 24 | 28 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 97 |
The entries in the table are the probabilities (as a percentage) of each treatment achieving each possible rank.