Schistosomiasis japonica, caused by Schistosoma japonicum, is still a major public-health concern in China, afflicting thousands of people (Zhou et al., 2007; Li et al., 2009). Since 1992, when the World Bank Loan Project for Schistosomiasis Control was initiated in China, praziquantel-based chemotherapy has been used to control the disease (Chen, 2005). Unfortunately, in the long term, repeated praziquantel treatment may lead to resistance to the drug in some Schistosoma species (Fallon et al., 1995; Ismail et al., 1996; Wang et al., 2010), and the development of new schistosomicidal drugs, as alternatives to praziquantel, is therefore a priority.
Artemisinin is a sesquiterpene lactone endoperoxide isolated from a Chinese medicinal plant [Artemisia annua L. (qinghao)] that has been used as a herbal remedy for fever and malaria for more than 1000 years (Klayman, 1985; Trigg, 1989). Dihydroartemisinin is a derivative of artemisinin (in which the C-10 lactone group has been replaced by hemiacetal) and is the active metabolite of several other artemisinin derivatives such as artemether and artesunate (Janse et al., 1994). Although, in both laboratory and field experiments, artemether and artesunate have each been found active against S. japonicum (Utzinger et al., 2001b; Li et al., 2005; Xiao, 2005; Keiser and Utzinger, 2007; Hua et al., 2010; Xiao et al., 2011), the effect of dihydroartemisinin on schistosomes remains unclear. The main aim of the present study was to explore the effects of dihydroartemisinin treatment on S. japonicum in experimentally infected mice, as a further step towards the development of novel schistosomicidal drugs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The dihydroartemisinin used was kindly provided by the Chonqging Holley Wuling Mountain Pharmaceutical company (batch 2006090131; 99·4% purity).The drug was ground in a ball miller with dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO), Tween-80 and distilled water to give aqueous solutions containing 8, 12, 16 or 24 g dihydroartemisinin/litre, 4%–8% (v/v) DMSO and 0·5% (v/v) Tween-80.
Mice of the Kunming strain, each weighing 20–24 g, were purchased from Yangzhou University (Yangzhou, China), and given free access to food and water. They were each infected percutaneously with 39–41 S. japonicum cercariae (from naturally infected Oncomelania hupensis collected in Anhui province, China) and then randomly assigned to groups, of 10 mice each.
In the first experiment, designed to assess the efficacy of dihydroartemisinin against the different developmental stages of S. japonicum, infected mice were left untreated (10 mice) or each treated with a single oral dose of the drug (at 300 mg/kg bodyweight, in a dose volume of about 0·5 ml) 2 h or 3, 5, 7, 10, 14, 18, 21, 28 or 35 days post-infection (with one group of mice used for each treatment time).
In a second experiment, designed to investigate the dose–response relationships of dihydroartemisinin against the schistosomula and adult worms of S. japonicum, single oral doses (of 200, 300, 400 or 600 mg/kg bodyweight, in a dose volume of about 0·5 ml) were given to mice that had been infected either 7 or 35 days previously. Again, similarly infected but untreated mice served as controls.
In both experiments, the mice were killed 50 days post-infection and any adult S. japonicum worms in the hepatic and portomesenteric veins were recovered by perfusion, sexed and counted. The reductions in the total number of worms recovered and in the number of female worms recovered that were apparently caused by drug treatment were then estimated, as percentages, by comparison with the numbers of worms recovered from the untreated control mice. The statistical significance of each reduction was then estimated using Fisher’s least-significant-difference (LSD) tests and version 11.0 of the SPSS software package (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL), with a P-value of <0·05 considered indicative of a statistically significant difference.
RESULTS
In the first experiment, single oral doses of dihydroartemisinin (at 300 mg/kg) reduced total worm burdens by 1·07%–64·81% and female-worm burdens by 11·90%–90·48%, depending on when, relative to infection, treatment was given (Table 1). The greatest reductions were seen when treatment was given either 7 or 35 days post-infection (Table 1).
Table 1. Effects of dihydroartemisinin treatment (a single dose of 300 mg/kg) on the recovery of adult Schistosoma japonicum from mice that had been experimentally infected 50 days earlier.
Mice | Mean (s.d.) no. of worms collected | Reduction* (%) | Mean (s.d.) no. of female worms collected | Reduction* (%) |
animals treated: | ||||
2 h post-infection | 27·8 (3·73) | 1·1 | 8·9 (2·42) | 15·3 |
3 days post-infection | 23·8 (8·27)† | 15·2 | 8·1 (3·84)† | 22·9 |
5 days post-infection | 19·3 (8·08)‡ | 31·3 | 5·8 (3·58)‡ | 44·8 |
7 days post-infection | 9·9 (2·42)‡ | 64·8 | 2·8 (1·75)‡ | 73·8 |
10 days post-infection | 21·9 (5·57)† | 22·0 | 8·3 (2·87) | 21·0 |
14 days post-infection | 18·9 (4·34)‡ | 32·7 | 7·9 (2·57)† | 24·9 |
18 days post-infection | 23·0 (3·46)† | 18·1 | 8·0 (2·98)† | 23·8 |
21 days post-infection | 24·0 (3·21) | 14·5 | 9·3 (2·66) | 11·9 |
28 days post-infection | 14·5 (4·08)‡ | 48·5 | 4·3 (2·33)‡ | 59·3 |
35 days post-infection | 11·1 (2·47)‡ | 60·5 | 1·0 (1·15)‡ | 90·5 |
Untreated controls | 28·1 (4·27) | 10·5 (2·68) |
*Compared with the corresponding values for the untreated (control) mice.
†Significant reduction compared with control (P<0·05).
‡Very significant reduction compared with control (P<0·01).
In the second experiment, a single treatment on day 7 post-infection reduced total and female-worm burdens significantly — by 46·8% and 59·7%, respectively — when the lowest dose (200 mg/kg) was tested (Table 2). Although use of the drug at 300 mg/kg on day 7 led to slightly greater reductions in the total number of worms (60·6%) and number of female worms (72·3%), further increases in the dose (to 400 or 600 mg/kg) caused no further increase in the reductions seen.
Table 2. Effects of four different single doses of dihydroartemisinin, given 7 or 35 days post-infection, on the recovery of adult Schistosoma japonicum from mice that had been experimentally infected 50 days earlier.
Treatment 7 days post-infection (of schistosomula) | Treatment 35 days post-infection (of adult worms) | |||||||||||
Drug dosage | </emph> | |||||||||||
(mg/kg) | Mean (s.d.) no. of worms collected | Reduction* (%) | Mean (s.d.) no. of female worms collected | Reduction* (%) | Mean (s.d.) no. of worms collected | Reduction* (%) | Mean (s.d.) no. of female worms collected | Reduction* (%) | ||||
200 | 13·8 | (6·81)† | 46·8 | 4·2 | (3·01)† | 59·7 | 13·7 | (3·43)† | 47·2 | 4·2 | (1·81)† | 59·7 |
300 | 10·2 | (2·49)† | 60·6 | 2·9 | (1·69)† | 72·3 | 9·8 | (3·76)† | 62·3 | 1·1 | (1·64)† | 89·4 |
400 | 10·5 | (4·52)† | 59·6 | 2·9 | (2·11)† | 72·6 | 6·2 | (2·91)† | 76·3 | 0·9 | (1·08)† | 89·7 |
600 | 10·3 | (2·00)† | 60·2 | 2·4 | (1·24)† | 76·6 | 4·3 | (1·91)† | 83·6 | 0·6 | (0·74)† | 94·0 |
None (control) | 26·0 | (5·36) | 10·4 | (3·78) | 26·0 | (5·36) | 10·4 | (3·78) |
*Compared with the corresponding values for the untreated (control) mice.
†Very significant reduction compared with control (P<0·01).
When given on day 35 post-infection, a single oral dose of either 200 or 300 mg/kg resulted in reductions in total and female-worm burdens ranging from 47·2% to 89·4% (P<0·01 for each; Table 2). Although the use of higher doses on day 35 led to even greater reductions, there was no clearcut dose–response relationship (Table 2).
DISCUSSION
Under laboratory conditions, it is possible to induce praziquantel resistance in S. mansoni by exposing the parasites to multiple sub-curative doses of the drug (Fallon and Doenhoff, 1994). Fortunately, there is little direct evidence of the existence of such resistance in field isolates of schistosomes, although decreased sensitivity to praziquantel has already been reported in S. mansoni in many endemic areas (Fallon et al., 1995; Ismail et al., 1996; Tchuem-Tchuenté et al., 2001; Melman et al., 2009) and repeated standard treatment with the drug has failed to clear S. haematobium from several patients (Silva et al., 2005; Alonso et al., 2006).
Since praziquantel, a highly effective and safe antischistosomal drug, was developed, it has been used (virtually alone) for the treatment and control of schistosomiasis japonica in China (Chen, 2005). Praziquantel-based chemotherapy remains an important part of the Chinese National Schistosomiasis Control Programme and has generally been found effective (Chen, 2005; Xiao, 2005). The possibility that, in the long term, repeated praziquantel treatments will, however, reduce the susceptibility of schistosomes, such as Chinese S. japonicum, to the drug is a major concern (Liang et al., 2001; Yu et al., 2001; Wang et al., 2010) and one that drives the current search for new antischistomal drugs.
Some artemisinin derivatives, notably artemether and artesunate, have already been used to prevent and control mammalain infection with some Schistosoma species (Utzinger et al., 2000, 2001b; Li et al., 2005; Keiser and Utzinger, 2007; Hua et al., 2010; Xiao et al., 2011).
The administration of artemether (in four, weekly doses, each of 300 mg/kg, from day 7 post-infection) to mice infected with S. japonicum, for example, resulted in female-worm reductions that exceeded 90% (Utzinger et al., 2001b). Whether administered, from 1–3 weeks post-infection, in weekly doses of 300 mg/kg (to mice infected with S. japonicum), 15 mg/kg (to rabbits infected with the same parasite) or 10 mg/kg (to dogs infected with the same parasite), artemether exhibited a broad spectrum of activity (Utzinger et al., 2001b ). As artemether and praziquantel have their greatest efficacies against juvenile and adult schistosomes, respectively (Xiao, 2005; Keiser and Utzinger, 2007; Xiao et al., 2011), it has been suggested that a combination of these two drugs might be more effective than either drug alone. Utzinger et al. (2001a) confirmed that combined treatment with praziquantel and artemether is safe and more effective against S. japonicum and S. mansoni than treatment with praziquantel alone.
Compared with artemether, artesunate appears similarly effective against S. japonicum, leading to worm reductions of 90%–99·5% when given — in four to six, weekly doses from day 7 post-infection — to infected mice (at 300 mg/kg in each dose), rabbits (at 20 mg/kg) or dogs (at 30 mg/kg), schistosomula aged 6–9 days showing the greatest sensitivity to the drug (Xiao, 2005). When artesunate was given as a single dose (of 300 mg/kg) to mice infected with S. mansoni, treatment on days 14 or 21 days post-infection (when the parasites are still schistosomula) led to the greatest worm-burden reductions, of 84% and 93%, respectively (Keiser and Utzinger, 2007; Xiao et al., 2011).
In the treatment of mice infected with S. japonicum, the present results indicate that dihydroartemisinin is particulary effective against 7-day-old schistosomula and 35-day-old adult worms. No marked dose–response relationship was observed, probably because dihydroartemisinin administered orally to mammals is rapidly absorbed, its blood concentration peaking just 1 h (mice) or 2 h (rabbits and dogs) post-administration and then falling rapidly (Zhao and Song, 1990, 1993). The activity of dihydroartemisinin against S. japonicum would therefore probably be enhanced by the use of multiple doses. Further studies should be carried out to investigate the antischistosomal effects of combined treatments with dihydroartemisinin and praziquantel, and the efficacy of dihydroartemisinin against other schistosome species.
Acknowledgments
This study received financial support from the National Science and Technology Pillar Programme of China (grant 2009BAI78B06), Jiangsu Province’s Outstanding Medical Academic Leader Programme (grant LJ200608) and the Jiangsu Department of Health (grants X200707 and X200911).
REFERENCES
- Alonso D, Muñoz J, Gascón J, Valls ME, Corachan M.(2006)American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 74342–344. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen MG.(2005)Acta Tropica 96168–176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fallon PG, Doenhoff MJ.(1994)American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 5183–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fallon PG, Sturrock RF, Niang AC, Doenhoff MJ.(1995)American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 5361–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hua HY, Liang YS, Zhang Y, Wei JF, Guo HX.(2010)Parasitology Research 107873–878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ismail M, Metwally A, Farghaly A, Bruce J, Tao LF, Bennett JL.(1996)American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 55214–218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Janse CJ, Waters AP, Kos J, Lugt CB.(1994)International Journal for Parasitology 24589–594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keiser J, Utzinger J.(2007)Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases 20605–612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klayman DL.(1985)Science 2281049–1055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li SZ, Luz A, Wang XH, Xu LL, Wang Q, Qian YJ, Wu XH, Guo JG, Xia G, Wang LY, Zhou XN.(2009)Chinese Medical Journal 1221009–1014. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li YS, Chen HG, He HB, Hou XY, Ellis M, McManus DP.(2005)Acta Tropica 96184–190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liang YS, Dai JR, Ning A, Yu DB, Xu XJ, Zhu YC, Coles GC.(2001)Tropical Medicine and International Health 6707–714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Melman SD, Steinauer ML, Cunningham C, Kubatko LS, Mwangi IN, Wynn NB, Mutuku MW, Karanja DM, Colley DG, Black CL, Secor WE, Mkoji GM, Loker ES.(2009)PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 3e504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Silva IM, Thiengo R, Conceição MJ, Rey L, Lenzi HL, Pereira FE, Ribeiro PC.(2005)Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 100445–449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tchuem-Tchuenté LA, Southgate VR, Mbaye A, Engels D, Gryseels B.(2001)Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 9565–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Trigg PI.(1989)Economic and Medicinal Plant Research 319–55. [Google Scholar]
- Utzinger J, N’Goran EK, N’Dri A, Lengeler C, Xiao S, Tanner M.(2000)Lancet 3551320–1325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Utzinger J, Chollet J, You J, Mei J, Tanner M, Xiao S.(2001a)Acta Tropica 809–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Utzinger J, Xiao SH, N’Goran EK, Bergquist R, Tanner M.(2001b)International Journal for Parasitology 311549–1562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang W, Dai JR, Li HJ, Shen XH, Liang YS.(2010)Parasitology 1371905–1912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xiao SH.(2005)Acta Tropica 96153–167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xiao SH, Mei JY, Jiao PY.(2011)Parasitology Research in press [Google Scholar]
- Yu DB, Li Y, Sleigh AC, Yu XL, Li YS, Wei WY, Liang YS, McManus DP.(2001)Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 95537–541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao CX, Song ZX.(1990)Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica 25147–150. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao CX, Song ZX.(1993)Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica 28342–346. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou XN, Guo JG, Wu XH, Jiang QW, Zheng J, Dang H, Wang XH, Xu J, Zhu HQ, Wu GL, Li YS, Xu XJ, Chen HG, Wang TP, Zhu YC, Qiu DC, Dong XQ, Zhao GM, Zhang SJ, Zhao NQ, Xia G, Wang LY, Zhang SQ, Lin DD, Chen MG, Hao Y(2007)Emerging Infectious Diseases 131470–1476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]