Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 7.
Published in final edited form as: Inf Process Med Imaging. 2013;23:25–36. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-38868-2_3

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

The upper left graph illustrates transform set change vs. iteration t, where change is measured by the maximum Frobenius norm affine transform matrix difference max||Tit-Tit-1||. Learning converges after 7 iterations, after which does not change. The lower left graph shows the relative numbers of conventional and inverted correspondences over iteration t, where the percentages reflect the proportion of inverted correspondences. Image sets to the right show images before alignment t = 0 and resampled after convergence according to Ti at t = 7. Note the slightly elevated orientation in aligned images; since alignment here is fully automatic, the final geometry of group-wise alignment is determined by the data.