TABLE 1.

Published case series with angiographic follow-up results of DAVFs treated with primary Onyx embolization^*

Authors & Year	Fistula Type	No. of Patients	Initial Cure Rate (%)	% Patients w/Follow-Up	Follow-Up Period (mos)	No. of Patients w/DAVF Recurrence
Abud et al., 2011	DAVF	42	81.8	95.2	6	0
Amiridze & Darwish, 2009	DAVF/CCF	9	100	100	6	0
Carlson et al., 2007	DAVF	6	83.3	100	3–9	0
Chew et al., 2009	DAVF	12	75.0	75.0	0.2–12	0
Cognard et al., 2008	DAVF	30	80.0	83.3	3	0
De Keukeleire et al., 2011	DAVF	20	85.0	70.0	4–14	1
Elhammady et al., 2010	CCF	12	100	50.0	4–35	0
Hu et al., 2011	DAVF	50	82.0†	92.0	3–25	5
Huang et al., 2009	DAVF	14	85.7	57.1	3–12	0
Lv et al., 2009	DAVF	40	62.5	72.5	3–8	0
Maimon et al., 2011	DAVF	17	94.0	47.1	3–12	0
Natarajan et al., 2010	DAVF/CCF	30	70.0	90.0	2–40	0
Nogueira et al., 2008	DAVF	12	83.3	75.0	1–6	1
Nogueira et al., 2009	sDAVF	3	100	100	10–15	0
Saraf et al., 2010	DAVF	25	84.0	80.0	6	0
Stiefel et al., 2009	DAVF	28	72.4	28.6	1–15	0
van Rooj et al., 2010	DAVF	8	100	100	1.5–3	0
Zenteno et al., 2010	CCF	5	80.0	80.0	6	0

^*CCF = carotid-cavernous fistula; sDAVF = spinal DAVF.

^†Reported cure rate at follow-up.