Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 29;42(Web Server issue):W277–W284. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku319

Table 1.

Ts mutant position as predicted by sequence-based, structured-based or both methods

Protein PDB ID Chain length Residue position Residue type Prediction method
gene V 1YHA 87 35 VAL Both
45 VAL Both
47 ILE Structure
63 VAL Structure
81 LEU Structure
78 ILE Sequence
lambda repressor 1LMB 92 51 PHE Both
65 LEU Both
76 PHE Both
84 ILE Both
18 LEU Structure
36 VAL Structure
47 VAL Structure
T4 lysozyme 2LZM 164 6 MET Both
102 MET Both
149 VAL Structure
153 PHE Structure
103 VAL Sequence
CcdB 3VUB 101 17 PHE Both
18 VAL Both
33 VAL Both
34 ILE Both
54 VAL Both
5 VAL Structure
36 LEU Structure
63 MET Structure
50 LEU Sequence
53* VAL Sequence
96 LEU Sequence
97 MET Sequence
98 PHE Sequence
Gal4 3COQ 88 68 PHE Both
69 LEU Sequence
70 LEU Sequence
Ura3 1DQW 267 25 MET Structure
32 LEU Structure
118 ILE Structure

The wild-type residue (three-letter amino acid code) at the position is listed under residue type. * The prediction of VAL53 in CcdB as a Ts mutant position is a false positive identification.