Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 10;14:145. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-145

Table 3.

Correlation coefficients between the OKI-DO instrument and generic observation instrument[24]during free play

Free play (generic) OKI-DO
Parent
 
 
 
Child
 
 
 
Family
 
  Emotional involvement Limit setting Respect for autonomy Quality of instruction Negative behavior Avoidance Cooperative behavior Child’s response to injection Emphasis on diabetes Mealtime structure
Parent’s
Supportive presence
.38 **
.22
.24*
.02
-.13
-.15
.16
.14
-.13
.16
 
Respect for child’s autonomy
.40**
.15
.31 **
.20
-.12
-.22
.17
.03
-.01
.00
 
Structure and limit setting
.18
.31 **
.23
.05
-.20
-.14
.20
.01
-.10
.24 *
 
Quality of instruction
.17
.12
.09
.07
-.13
.01
.00
.03
-.05
.03
 
Hostility
-.35 **
-.11
-.45 **
-.08
-.02
.28 *
-.18
-.12
.16
-.02
 
Confidence
.18
.35 **
.14
-.04
-.28 *
-.14
.23
.02
-.13
.38 **
Child’s
Negativity
-.19
-.15
-.16
-.12
.14
.08
-.14
-.10
.13
.01
 
Avoidance of parent
-.09
-.13
-.19
-.08
.12
.30 **
-.01
-.01
.08
-.02
 
Compliance
.18
.26 *
.33 **
.21
-.10
-.15
.14
.14
-.09
.05
 
Affection toward parent
.28 *
.18
.33 **
.07
-.17
-.13
.18
.16
-.03
.01
 
Persistence
.16
.28 *
.01
-.03
-.09
-.04
.19
.09
.22
.26 *
 
Reliance on parent for help
.15
-.09
-.10
-.00
.04
.07
-.07
.07
.02
.02
 
Enthusiasm
.14
.12
.08
-.17
-.01
.02
.04
.18
.27*
-.06
  Experience of the session .33 ** .25* .29 * .02 -.05 -.00 .12 .19 .07 .18

.xx = Expected correlation.

*Correlation is significant on a 0.05 level.

**Correlation is significant on a 0.01 level.