Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 4;35(6):792–805. doi: 10.1038/aps.2014.24

Table 3. Pharmacokinetic parameters of paroxetine and pravastatin after oral administration in diabetic rats on d 1 and 28 of treatment. Data represent the mean±SEM of 5–6 rats. bP<0.05, cP<0.01 vs DM-PA or DM-PR on d 1. fP<0.01 vs DM-PA or DM-PR on d 28.

    t1/2 (h) Tmax (h) Cmax (ng/mL) AUC0–t (h·ng/mL) AUC0–∞ (h·ng/mL) Cl/F (L·h−1·kg−1) MRT (h)
Paroxetine
d 1 DM-PA 3.21±0.34 2.70±0.54 63.56±7.28 529.78±55.28 535.35±56.44 19.98±3.08 6.49±0.21
  DM-CO 3.48±0.33 2.40±0.40 129.16±18.55b 717.50±37.18b 729.33±39.40b 14.58±0.97 5.63±0.42
d 28 DM-PA 3.94±0.25 1.83±0.11 73.95±10.02 490.71±24.62 514.75±33.47 21.68±1.55 6.64±0.26
  DM-CO 3.52±0.31 2.00±0.00 252.20±33.77f 1134.77±115.49f 1143.13±115.74f 9.47±1.45f 4.55±0.29f
Pravastatin
d 1 DM-PR 1.50±0.09 0.25±0.00 31.85±4.64 26.94±1.31 31.75±1.25 317.02±13.13 1.16±0.05
  DM-CO 0.93±0.19b 0.55±0.05c 89.56±5.00c 121.46±11.43c 128.83±10.28c 79.54±6.02c 1.23±0.04
d 28 DM-PR 1.95±0.24 0.25±0.00 8.38±1.68 14.68±2.88 18.96±3.01 585.52±93.86 1.50±0.05
  DM-CO 1.23±0.23 0.55±0.05f 29.12±2.76f 43.05±6.65f 47.68±6.00f 222.56±25.55f 1.30±0.06

AUC0–t of paroxetine was AUC0–24 and AUC0–t of pravastatin was AUC0–4.