Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 18;2014:698265. doi: 10.1155/2014/698265

Table 2.

Risk of bias in included randomized controlled trials.

Study Random sequence generation Allocation concealment Blinding of participants and personnel Blinding of outcome assessment Incomplete outcome data Selective reporting Other sources of bias
Cappi 2012 [14] Low risk Low risk High risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk
COIITSS 2010 (France) [16] Low risk Low risk High risk Low risk Low risk Low risk High riska
Savioli 2009 [12] Low risk Unclear High risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk
Iapichino 2008 [11] Low risk Unclear High risk High risk Low risk Unclear Low risk
Brunkhorst 2008 [10] Low risk Low risk High risk High risk Low risk Low risk High riska,b
Ellger 2008 [25] Low risk Low risk High risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk
Yu 2005 [13] Unclear Unclear High risk Low risk Low risk High risk Low risk
Dong 2009 [27] Unclear Unclear High risk High risk Low risk Unclear Low risk
NICE-SUGAR 2009 (Australia and New Zealand—Canada) [17] Low risk Low risk High risk Low risk Low risk Low risk High riskc
Arabi 2008 [24] Low risk Low risk High risk Low risk Low risk Low risk High riskd
Zhang 2008 [26] Unclear Unclear High risk Low risk Low risk Unclear Low risk
Jin 2009 [23] NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

*Abstract only.

NA: not available from article or author.

aThe two treatment groups differ in the use of medications other than insulin.

bIntensive insulin therapy was terminated early because of increasing hypoglycemic events.

cInclusion used subjective criteria.

dIt had a different baseline.