Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 26;13:25. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-13-25

Table 7.

Absolute difference in measures to closest delivery facility calculated from compound compared to measures calculated from village centroid, n = 9,306 births

Distance to closest delivery facility 1 Mean (SD) Median (IQR) 90% 95% Range
Euclidean (km)
0.25 (0.24)
0.18 (0.08-0.34)
0.57
0.74
8.34E-06 - 2.64
Network distance (km)
0.38 (0.35)
0.28 (0.13-0.52)
0.84
1.11
0.000098 - 2.87
Mechanized network time (hr)
0.092 (0.10)
0.057 (0.025-0.12)
0.22
0.31
5.66E-07 - 0.74
Non-mechanized network time (hr)
0.13 (0.12)
0.09 (0.041-0.17)
0.30
0.39
0.000041 - 0.85
Mechanized raster time (hr)
0.17 (0.23)
0.16 (0.0042-0.18)
0.46
0.57
0 - 2.22
Non-mechanized raster time (hr)
0.20 (0.25)
0.13 (0.50-0.24)
0.48
0.69
0 - 2.42
Distance to closest CEmOC 2
Mean (SD)
Median (IQR)
90%
95%
Range
Euclidean (km)
0.30 (0.31)
0.20 (0.09-0.41)
0.69
0.96
0.000094 - 2.94
Network distance (km)
0.46 (0.48)
0.30 (0.13-0.63)
1.12
1.48
9.54E-06 - 3.21
Mechanized network time (hr)
0.083 (0.089)
0.055 (0.024-0.11)
0.20
0.26
8.94E-07 - 0.69
Non-mechanized network time (hr)
0.14 (0.14)
0.10 (0.013-0.19)
0.35
0.46
3.48E-05 - 0.94
Mechanized raster time (hr)
0.18 (0.25)
0.16 (0.005-0.18)
0.50
0.68
0 - 2.22
Non-mechanized raster time (hr) 0.23 (0.27) 0.15 (0.050-0.30) 0.58 0.79 0 - 2.04

1n=64 delivery facilities; 2n=8 CEmOC facilities.