Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 8.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Sep 1;71(3):232–238. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.07.015

Table 1.

ED50 Values (95% Confidence Interval, nmol) for Antinociception Produced by DOR-Selective and MOR-Selective Agonists in Naïve WT, DOR KO, and MOR KO Mice and WT Mice Who Had Been Voluntarily Consuming Ethanol

ED50 (95% CI, nmol)
Mice Deltorphin II DPDPE SNC80 DAMGO
Thermal Naïve 1.19 (.9–1.6) 1.18 (.9–1.7) ND .009 (.006–.013)
DOR KO .75 (.5–1.1)a .69 (.3–1.5) ND .016 (.009–.031)
MOR KO ND ND ND ND
Ethanol .42 (.31–.60)b .39 (.29–.55)b ND .003 (.002–.007)
Mechanical Naïve 1.66 (1.2–2.3) 6.37 (3.5–28.1) 5.04 (3.1–10.1) .024 (.016–.039)
DOR KO ND ND ND >.03
MOR KO ND ND 6.06 (3.4–14.0) >1
Ethanol 2.06 (1.3–4.6) 8.61 (5.5–24.2) 4.06 (2.8–6.4) .027 (.016–.046)

Thermal antinociception was measured using a radiant heat tail-flick assay. Mechanical sensitivity was measured using von Frey filaments. GraphPad Prism (Graphpad Software, La Jolla, California) was used to determine statistical differences between groups.

CI, confidence interval; DOR, delta opioid receptor; DPDPE, [D-Pen2,D-Pen5]-Enkephalin; ED50, effective dose 50%; KO, knockout; MOR, mu opioid receptor; ND, not detectable; WT, wild-type.

a

p < .05.

b

p < .001.