Table 2.
Reference | Involved sites | Method of hand hygiene compliance surveillance or other outcome measures | Direct observation method (if used) |
Allegranzi et al. [5▪▪] | Six pilot sites across Costa Rica, Italy, Mali, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia | Direct observation | 5 Moments |
Questionnaire on knowledge of health care workers | |||
Allegranzi et al. [9▪] | 168 facilities across the USA | 76.1% direct observation at least every 3 months | Primarily room entry and exit although numbers not specified |
39.8% ABHR consumption | |||
34.1% soap consumption | |||
Fuller et al. [32] | 16 acute hospitals in England and Wales | Direct observation | Hand Hygiene Observation Tool (HHOT) [41] |
Consumption of hand hygiene products | |||
Grayson et al. [17] | National programme in Australia | Direct observation | 5 Moments |
Jarlier et al. [19] | 38 teaching hospitals in France | Consumption of hand hygiene products | |
Kirkland et al. [28] | Single centre in the USA | Direct observation | ‘Before-and-after contact with patients or their immediate environments’ |
Latham et al. [11▪] | Evaluations of 18 hand hygiene campaigns across the European Union and European Economic Area Member States | 70% direct observation | Not specified |
33% consumption of HH products | |||
10% availability of ABHR | |||
10% questionnaire | |||
20% self assessment survey | |||
Reichardt et al. [42▪] | German national programme | Direct observation in 180 of >700 hospitals | 5 Moments |
Consumption of hand hygiene products | |||
Reisinger et al. [43] | Veterans Health Administration encompassing 141 medical centres in the USA | 98.6% direct observation | A variety of moments observed, most often room entry and exit |
22.7% consumption of hand hygiene products | 41.4% reported monitoring ‘5 Moments’ in addition to other opportunities | ||
2.8% automated monitoring systems | |||
Salmon et al. [44] | Single centre in Vietnam | Direct observation | |
Consumption of hand hygiene products | |||
Stone et al. [18] | 187 acute trusts in England and Wales | Consumption of hand hygiene products | |
Schweizer et al. [30▪▪] | Meta analysis of 45 hand hygiene intervention bundles worldwide | 86.6% direct observation | Variety of methods utilized most commonly ‘5 Moments’, room entry and exit, before and after patient contact, or unspecified |
13.3% consumption of hand hygiene products | |||
4.4 % video surveillance | |||
11.1% automated monitoring systems | |||
Szilagyi et al. [45] | Single centre in Singapore | Evaluation of HH technique |
ABHR, alcohol-based hand rub.