Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 8;9(7):e101384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101384

Table 2. Estimation of selection pressure and sequence variability for H5N1 influenza virus.

Gene Length (nt) Positively selected sitea Sites under positive selection dN/dS (95% CI)b Variability (%)c
SLAC FEL IFEL
PB2 2277 None None None 0 0.102 (0.094–0.110) 1.559
PB1 2271 215, 384, 610 215, 384, 610 64, 215, 573, 577, 610 6 0.103 (0.094–0.111) 1.593
PA 2148 337, 544 101, 201, 237, 337, 544, 669, 712 237, 337, 544 7 0.162 (0.151–0.173) 1.810
HA 1656 138, 140, 156 115, 138, 140, 141, 156 45, 115, 138, 140, 141, 156 6 0.287 (0.266–0.308) 1.914
NP 1494 None 452, 482 452 2 0.089 (0.080–0.100) 1.470
NA 1407 2, 340 2, 46, 70, 73, 74, 84, 100, 427 8, 46, 74, 76, 100, 340 11 0.246 (0.226–0.268) 1.934
M1 756 None None None 0 0.129 (0.110–0.150) 1.385
M2 291 18, 82 18, 82 14, 18, 82 3 0.636 (0.531–0.753) 1.823
NS1 690 197 127, 197, 205 127, 171, 185, 197, 209, 212, 227 8 0.434 (0.395–0.477) 2.428
NS2 363 None 14, 34 14, 52, 111 4 0.398 (0.340–0.462) 2.098
a

FEL, iFEL, SLAC significance levels are indicated by P values and site under positive selection (P<0.05) are detected by at least one method.

b

The dN/dS ratios are estimated using the FEL method available in the Hyphy package.

c

The variability of each segment is calculated at the amino acid level.