Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 8.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Med. 2012 Apr 4;75(1):60–68. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.017

Table 5.

Interaction findings for women.

Current drinker (OR) Frequency 5+frequency Volume Risky drinking (OR)





College Employed College Employed College Employed College Employed College Employed
Intercept 6.86*** 1.85***
SocioEd Status 0.11 0.00
College 0.93*** 0.03
Coll × SocioEd 0.30* 0.69**
Employed
Empl × SocioEd Status

Intercept 6.84*** 0.23***
GE SocioEd −0.31* 0.99
College
Coll × Violence Pol
Employed −0.18+ 0.95
Empl × GE SocioEd −0.61*** 1.09*

Intercept 0.79*** 6.89*** 0.17*** 1.85*** 1.85*** 0.24*** 0.24***
Repro Rights 0.99 0.32+ −0.02* 0.00 0.01 0.97 0.97
College 0.83*** 0.01 0.77***
Coll × Political Part 0.26** 0.05** 1.06*
Employed 1.29*** −0.00 −0.04* 0.94+
Empl × Repro Rights 0.95** −0.01+ −0.03** 0.93+

Intercept 6.87*** 0.17*** 1.86*** 0.24***
Violence Pol −0.01 −0.15*** −0.02+ 0.96*
College 0.81*** −0.07*** 0.01 0.76***
Coll × Violence Pol 0.19** 0.01+ 0.03** 1.06*
Employed
Empl × Violence Pol

Intercept 0.79*** 6.86***
Political Part 1.01* 0.03
College 0.88***
Coll × Violence Pol 0.4+
Employed 1.28***
Empl × Political Part 0.99*
*

p < 0.05,

**

p < 0.01,

***

p < 0.001.

Each gender equality indicator is included in a separate model.

Models adjust for individual-level age, race, income, marital status, college graduation, employment, and state-level median income, income inequality, and % Evangelical/Mormon.