Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2014 Feb 13;20(4):402–412. doi: 10.1017/S135561771400006X

Table 2.

Clustering and recall performance across trials on the CVLT-II, and corresponding Pearson correlation coefficients

Clustering
Recall
Correlation Analyses
M SD M SD r p
Controls
    Trial 1 0.023 0.833 5.51 1.51 .415* .002
    Trial 5 1.717 3.050 11.94 2.76 .565* <.001
    Short-delay 2.355 2.470 9.70 3.24 .718* <.001
    Long-delay 2.845 2.767 10.36 3.48 .697* <.001
naMCI
    Trial 1 –0.087 0.751 4.93 1.72 .299 .108
    Trial 5 0.993 2.221 11.37 2.37 –.159 .400
    Short-delay 1.427 1.826 9.03 3.01 .592* .001
    Long-delay 2.100 2.578 9.63 2.62 .569* .001
aMCI
    Trial 1 –0.049 0.626 3.99 1.69 .039 .727
    Trial 5 0.088 1.454 7.65 2.57 .363* .001
    Short-delay 0.213 1.156 4.65 3.54 .357* .001
    Long-delay 0.566 1.409 3.96 3.66 .663* <.001
AD
    Trial 1 –0.060 0.526 2.80 1.77 –.125 .512
    Trial 5 0.080 0.853 5.10 2.29 .331 .074
    Short-delay 0.160 0.334 1.20 1.75 .002 .990
    Long-delay 0.160 0.225 0.53 1.01 –.298 .110

Note. CVLT-II = California Verbal Learning Test-II (raw chance-adjusted semantic clustering scores: –3 to 9, raw recall scores: 0 to 16; Delis et al., 2000)

*

Significant correlation between clustering and recall measures (p ≤ .0125).