Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2014 Feb 13;20(4):402–412. doi: 10.1017/S135561771400006X

Table 5.

Correlations between semantic clustering on CVLT-II and neuropsychological test performance

Trial 1 Trial 5 Short-delay Long-delay
Controls
    Animal Fluency –.046 .246 .131 .059
    TMT-Part B –.156 –.027 –.116 –.108
    Stroop Interference .146 –.188 –.151 –.115
naMCI
    Animal Fluency .184 –.258 .253 .171
    TMT-Part B –.104 –.043 –.365** –.271
    Stroop Interference –.059 .297 –.112 –.158
aMCI
    Animal Fluency .051 .161 .253* .239*
    TMT-Part B –.101 –.235* –.174 –.309**
    Stroop Interference –.034 –.170 –.188 –.316**
AD
    Animal Fluency –.099 .230 –.057 .114
    TMT-Part B –.158 –.274 –.110 –.084
    Stroop Interference –.026 –.405 .398 .065

Note. CVLT-II = California Verbal Learning Test-II (raw chance-adjusted semantic clustering scores: –3 to 9; raw recall scores: 0 to 16; Delis et al., 2000); naMCI = nonamnestic mild cognitive impairment; aMCI = amnestic mild cognitive impairment; AD = Alzheimer's disease; TMT = Trail Making Test.

*

small effect size.

**

medium effect size.