Table 3. Evaluation of the assay system 3: ebony as the marker gene.
1st RNAi | 2nd RNAi | Initial # of larvae | # survived | # of 2nd instar | ebony | WT | suppression | |
250 bp Ago2 (5 ug/mL) | 250 bp ebony (5 ug/mL) | co-feeding | 30 | 24 | 18 | 13 | 5 | 27% |
250 bp Dcr2 (5 ug/mL) | 250 bp ebony (5 ug/mL) | co-feeding | 28 | 26 | 25 | 19 | 6 | 24% |
250 bp KA (5 ug/mL) | 250 bp ebony (5 ug/mL) | co-feeding | 27 | 24 | 19 | 13 | 6 | 31% |
250 bp Ago2 (5 ug/mL) | 250 bp ebony (5 ug/mL) | sequential | 30 | 20 | 16 | 13 | 3 | 18% |
250 bp Dcr2 (5 ugmL) | 250 bp ebony (5 ug/mL) | sequential | 28 | 21 | 20 | 19 | 1 | 5% |
250 bp KA (5 ug/mL) | 250 bp ebony (5 ug/mL) | sequential | 27 | 14 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 0% |
Evaluation of the assay system with ebony as the marker gene instead of lac2. The second instar larvae were categorized into the ebony phenotype (i.e. the second RNAi worked) and the WT phenotype (i.e. the second RNAi is suppressed). The suppression of the second RNAi phenotype by the initial RNAi was evaluated as the proportion of the WT larvae in the survived second instar larvae (Suppression).