Table 2.
Anti-Tat, anti-Env and anti-Gag antibody responses.
|
High anti-Tat Ab titers |
Low anti-Tat Ab titers |
No anti-Tat Ab |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| ( n = 11) | ( n = 9) | ( n = 41) | |
|
Anti-Tat Ab-positive (n, %) |
|
|
|
| IgM and IgG positive |
3 (27%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
| IgG and IgA positive |
1 (9%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
| IgM positive |
0 (0%) |
6 (67%) |
0 (0%) |
| IgG positive |
6 (55%) |
3 (33%) |
0 (0%) |
| IgA positive |
1 (9%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
|
Anti-Env Ab-positive (n, %) |
11 (100%) |
9 (100%) |
41 (100%) |
|
Anti-Gag Ab-positive (n, %) |
11 (100%) |
9 (100%) |
41 (100%) |
|
Median titers (range) |
|
|
|
| IgM anti-Tat |
25 (25–25) |
25 (25–25) |
<25 |
| IgG anti-Tat |
600 (200–12800) |
100 (100–100) |
<100 |
| IgA anti-Tat |
100 (25–200) |
<25 |
<25 |
| IgG anti-Env |
12,800 (800–51,200) |
3,200 (400–12,800) |
6,400 (800–38,400) |
| IgG anti-Gag | 102,400 (4,000-2,457,600) | 12,800 (1,600-819,200) | 19,200 (200–3,276,800) |