Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006 May 18;101(3):898–905. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00126.2006

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Relative hydroxyproline content of EDL (A) and soleus (B) muscles from MSTN+/+, MSTN+/− and MSTN−/− mice. (A) Compared with MSTN+/+ mice, the amount of hydroxyproline per mg of dry EDL muscle mass was less for MSTN+/− and MSTN−/− mice. (B) There was no difference in the amount of hydroxyproline per mg of dry soleus muscle mass between MSTN+/+, MSTN+/− and MSTN−/− mice. Values are means ± SE. N = 5 muscles per genotype. *Significantly different from MSTN+/+ at P < 0.05.