Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 3;9(7):e100123. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100123

Table 3. Sensitivity of the RNA profiling methods using quantitative approach (input totalRNA) by real-time PCR.

RNA input [ng]
Body Fluid Marker 25 5 1 0.2 0.04 0.008
Blood HBB 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10 10/10
GLY 10/10 10/10 10/10 7/10 2/10 0/10
PBGD 10/10 10/10 7/10 3/10 0/10 0/10
Nasal secretion STATH 8/8 8/8 8/8 7/8 4/8 1/8
Saliva 8/8 8/8 8/8 6/8 3/8 0/8
HTN3 8/8 8/8 8/8 8/8 7/8 5/8
Semen PRM2 4/4 4/4 4/4 4/4 4/4 3/4
TGM4 6/6 6/6 6/6 6/6 6/6 5/6
Vaginal secretion MUC4 5/5 5/5 5/5 4/5 2/5 0/5
HBD1 5/5 5/5 5/5 5/5 3/5 1/5
Menstrual blood MMP7 5/5 5/5 5/5 5/5 5/5 3/5
MMP11 5/5 5/5 5/5 5/5 3/5 1/5
Oral mucosa KRT4 8/8 8/8 8/8 8/8 8/8 8/8
Urine UMOD NT NT 14/16 11/16 3/16 0/16
Sweat DCD NT NT 6/6 5/6 2/6 1/6
Skin LOR NT NT 6/6 6/6 5/6 4/6
CST6 NT NT 6/6 6/6 5/6 3/6

Total RNA was extracted from samples from 4–16 donors (as described in 2.2.1). A range of input total RNA was reverse transcribed and the resulting cDNA was amplified. Each experiment was carried out 3 times. dCt≤23 represent positive results. NT: not tested.