Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 15.
Published in final edited form as: Transplantation. 2013 Nov 15;96(9):807–813. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182a0f668

Table 2.

Crude and adjusted hazard ratios for post-transplant outcomes according to the duration of ESA hyporesponsiveness

ESA Hyporesponsiveness * Allograft Failure Allograft Loss All-Cause Mortality

Crude HR (95%CI) Adjusted HR (95%CI) Crude HR (95%CI) Adjusted HR (95%CI) Crude HR (95%CI) Adjusted HR (95% CI)
3-months 1.39 (1.21, 1.59) 1.23 (1.10, 1.42) 1.44 (1.31, 1.58) 1.39 (1.25, 1.54) 1.52 (1.36, 1.69) 1.61 (1.43, 1.81)
6-months 1.65 (1.35, 2.03) 1.43 (1.15, 1.78) 1.60 (1.38, 1.86) 1.59 (1.36, 1.87) 1.61 (1.35, 1.91) 1.85 (1.55, 2.23)

Allograft failure, present if: a second transplant, or return to dialysis. Allograft loss, present if: a second transplant, or return to dialysis, or death with a functioning graft.

*

ESA hyporesponsiveness defined as hematocrit ≤33% and erythropoiesis stimulating agent dose ≥75K units/month.

Hazard ratios derived from Cox proportional hazards models comparing ESA hyporesponsiveness to appropriate ESA response. All hazard ratios were statistically significant with p-value <0.01.

Adjusted for age, gender, weight, race/ethnicity, hemodialysis vintage, hemodialysis catheter, diabetes status, and donor type.